Search About Newsletters Donate
Donate today. Double your impact.

Through December 31, Marshall Project board member Abby Pucker is matching all donations, dollar for dollar, up to $75,000. Double your donation and receive a special thank-you gift by making your gift today.

The Rules

Can Weaves Be Dangerous?

The problem of race and hair behind bars.

The Place: Gregg County Jail, Longview, Texas

The Rule: Inmates must remove hair weaves, even if they're braided, glued, or sewn into the hairline.

The Reason: “This procedure is in place for the safety and security of the jail operation as well as personal hygiene. Contraband has been recovered when artificial hair integrations were removed from inmates,” said Gregg County Sheriff Maxey Cerliano. “The removal process is most commonly accomplished by jail staff requesting that the inmate remove the artificial hair integrations.” If an inmate refuses to comply, state jail rule 277.7, or compelled haircuts, kicks in.

The Real Reason: According to Branden Johnson, president of the NAACP’s chapter in Longview, Texas, “It is geared towards minorities. They are the ones using the hairpieces.” Similar policies don’t exist at nearby facilities: Local county jails allow inmates to keep hard-to-remove weaves and extensions, reported the Longview News-Journal. Elsewhere, at the Century Regional Correctional Facility in Los Angeles, which has also housed Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan, glued or stitched-in locks are permissible. Lohan kept her extensions during a two-week stint at Century Regional in 2010 for violating probation in a DUI case.

The Confusion: The police department in Warren, Mich., fired Officer Bernadette Najor in December 2013 after she removed the hair weave of a woman who was being detained at a police station. Surveillance video recorded three male officers forcing the 22-year-old woman, Charda Gregory, to sit in a chair before Najor performed a three-minute haircut. Police officials contended that the department had no written policy on hair weave removals and kicked Najor off the force. Najor argued that her supervisor told her that she had to confiscate any items that were not permanently attached to a person’s body. The local police union sided with Najor, and an arbitrator ruled in December that the police department had to take her back.

This is not a paywall.

We’ll never put our work behind a paywall, and we’ll never put a limit on the number of articles you can read. Our ability to take on big, groundbreaking investigations — the kind that can lead to real impact — doesn’t depend on advertisers or corporate owners. It depends on people like you. Our independence is our strength, and your donation makes us stronger.

When you donate by December 31, your donation will be matched, dollar for dollar, by Marshall Project board member Abby Pucker. As a special thank-you gift, we'll also send you one of our exclusive Marshall Project tote bags.