Search About Subscribe Donate
Filed 7:15 a.m.

Do You Have What It Takes To Be a Prison Censor?

Test yourself against the pros.

For those doing time in prison, books and magazines can be a refuge, a civilizing influence and a source of skills that might help make them employable citizens when they get out. To those who run the prisons, the wrong books and magazines can seem a source of disorder and danger.

It’s not hard to imagine why prison officials would deny an inmate a copy of “How to Beat Up Anybody.” Or “The Soldier of Fortune Guide to How to Disappear and Never be Found.” And surely the inmate who sent away for “The CIA Lockpicking Manual” knew he was pressing his luck.

But it’s less obvious why the authorities would ban “The 4-Hour Chef,” “The Illustrated Bible” and “The Big Book of Solitaire.”

We can now supply some insight, thanks to a trove of documents extracted from the Arizona state prison system by the American Civil Liberties Union. The documents, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, list hundreds of books and magazines, including all of the aforementioned titles, that were sent to Arizona inmates between July 2012 and October 2014. The documents reveal which publications were “allowed,” which were “excluded” — and, most intriguing, why.

So how do prison censors draw the line between a good book and a bad influence? Below are 20 titles that were requested by Arizona inmates.

Were they allowed or excluded? Click on your choice to see the verdict of the censors, along with the explanations given for those that were prohibited.
You got 0/20. Share your results.

Before you go...

Can you help us make a difference?

The Marshall Project produces journalism that makes an impact. Our investigation into violence using police dogs prompted departments from Indiana to Louisiana to change their policies. Thousands of cameras were installed in the infamous Attica prison after we revealed the extent of violent abuse by guards. Municipalities stopped charging parents for their kids’ incarceration because of our reporting. Supreme Court justices have cited us, along with incarcerated people acting as their own lawyers.

The type of reporting we practice takes persistence, skill and, above all, time, which is why we need your support. Donations from readers like you allow us to commit the time and attention needed to tell stories that are driving real change. We could not do it without you.

Please donate to The Marshall Project today. We’re extremely grateful to each and every donor who helps power our journalism. Your support goes a long way toward sustaining this important work.

This article has 1 letter to the editor. Read the letter.